Next Video Playing In ×
In the first video of the series, Rabbi Fohrman raises the question of why Purim is called Purim, emphasizing how odd it is to name a holiday after the device Haman used to try to destroy the Jews. He points out that the text of the megillah itself seems to indicate that there is more to the name of the holiday than we have traditionally believed.
When Haman cast lots to destroy us, he left the decision of which day it would be that the Jews would be killed in this mass genocide, up to the winds of faith; up to chance. When the Megillah describes this, it says v’hipil pur hu hagoral - “ he cast lots” lehumam uleabdam. Leabdam means “to destroy them”, but lehumam means more than to destroy them. It means “ to terrify them”. The lots were instruments of psychological warfare. They were making a statement. You think there’s a plan, you think there is a creator who runs things with a sense of order, I say it’s all up to chance, I determine the fate of you all with a roll of the dice! It was terrifying! Why would we name the day after that terror? Why would we name the day after a theological vision that we reject? We don’t think it’s all up to chance.
It is true that God’s name does not appear in the Megillah; that God works behind the scenes but we don’t believe that God was absent. So why would we name the holiday after a vision of chance that we don’t even believe in? Why call it Purim?
Now the truth is, the Megillah it self, in chapter 9, towards the very end, actually tries to explains to us why the holiday is called Purim; why it’s called Lots. If we really want to understand why it's called Purim, we should look at those verses yet those verses themselves are hard to understand. Let’s take a look at them now for a minute.
They begin in chapter 9 vs 34 ki Haman ben-hamdata haagagi- “ Haman the Agagite” , tzorer kol-hayehudim, “enemy of all the Jews” , chashav al-hayehudim leabdam“ plotted concerning the Jews to destroy them” v’hipil pur hu hagoral lehumam uleabdam- “ and cast lots in order to terrify them and to destroy them.” U’beboah lifnei hamelech “ But when she [Esther] came before the King’, amar im-hasefer “she said by means of a written decree” yashuv machashavto haraah asher-chashav al-hayehudim al-rosho “ she manage through this written decree to overturns Haman’s plan so that it came recoiling upon his own head” V’talu oto v’et-banav al-haetz- “ and he himself was hanged upon the very tree that he had prepared for Mordecai”. al-ken karu layamim haeleh purim “that’s why the call these days Purim’ al-shem hapur “ because of the pur”. al-ken, “this is why” al-kol-divrei hageret hazot “ because of everything that Esther wrote in that letter”, umah rau ol-kachah - “and what came to the Jews because of that letter”, umah higiya aleihem, “and what eventually befell them.”
Now, when you really start thinking about those verses, they are actually really quite confusing. In broad terms, they’ve set forth three ideas, but if you look closely, the three ideas seem to be out of order.
Idea #1 - Haman tried to kill us and to find the day in which he would kill us he cast lots. Idea #2 - Esther, thank God, managed to save us. Idea #3 - And that’s why they call the holiday Lots. But that’s all very fine. But ideas 1, 2 & 3 seems to be all out of order. Shouldn’t it have said “Haman tried to kill us and he cast lots in order to destroy us - parenthetically - and that’s why the all the holiday Lots.” And then finally “ And thank God, Esther managed to save us!” It doesn’t seem to make sense. The way it’s currently written - “Haman tried to kill us and he cast lots in order to do so. Thank God Esther saved us and that’s why they called the holiday Lot”. What do you mean “ and that’s why they call the holiday Lots?” That’s not why they called the holiday Lots. They don’t call the holiday Lot because “Thank God Esther tried to save us”, they call the holiday Lots because “ Haman cast lots”. So it’s strange, if you take ideas 2 and 3 and you switch them, if you make idea # 3, idea #2 and idea #2, Idea #3, then it would make sense. But that’s not how the verses are written. What are these verses trying to tell us?
I think they are trying to tell us that the holiday is called Lots for a reason we don’t even suspects. It was not called Lots because of Haman’s lots. Haman’s lots were destructive, Haman's lots were the enemy; we never would have named the holiday after the enemy. We name it after something else instead. We don’t name it after something he did; we name it after something she did - the holiday is named for something Esther did. Haman tried to kill us with lots, Esther, thank God tried to saved us and succeed and that’s why they call the holiday Lot. There is something about what Esther did. What did she do that explains why we would call this day Purim. That’s what we need to figure out.