The High Holidays’ Scariest Prayer

Interpreting The Meaning Of Unetaneh Tokef

Rabbi David Fohrman

Rabbi David Fohrman


At the center of the Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur prayer services is the passage "Unetaneh Tokef," literally, “let us speak of the awesomeness.” The powerful and dramatic prayer borrows imagery from the story of Elijah on Mt. Carmel. A closer look at this biblical story sheds light on God's relationship with His people, a relationship of justice and mercy. Join Rabbi Fohrman as he helps us understand the prayer of "Unetaneh Tokef" in a deeper way.

Read More

Please sign in or sign up to comment.


So today we are going to take a look at one of the roots of the centerpiece of the Yom Kippur davening, Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashanah davening, and it's one of the most familiar parts of the machzor when Art Scroll published it, machzor and put out ads for it, the page they opened to was this one I think. In addition to Kol Nidrei, the other page they open to was Unetaneh Tokef.

The High Holidays' Scariest Prayer: Interpreting Unetaneh Tokef

It's a famous piyut, you all know the story behind it, the crusader story behind it, of Amnon of Mainz, that is the story which we are not going to talk about today. So we're going to talk about the roots of Unetaneh Tokef, I am not talking about that story.

I am actually talking about something that goes back before that, because if you look at the poem itself, at the piyut itself, the piyut borrows imagery. The central part of the piyut borrows from the story of Tanach and I would like to use that story in Tanach to kind of shed light on, kind of a new look on, Unetaneh Tokef.

So let me give you some questions to sort of ponder. This is one of those talks that leaves you with more questions than answers, but hopefully the questions will be enlightening as well.

The centerpiece of Unetaneh Tokef is a very scary prayer, it's probably one of the scariest part of the Yom Kippur davening, we talk in vivid terms of people passing before God, and God deciding what their fate will be, for better or for worse as it were.

And there is this phrase, I don't have it in front of me, but you will correct me, umelachim yechafezun v'chil uradah yochazun v'amru hineh yom hadin. And the moment that invites that sort of extreme reaction on the part of the angels that they tremble before God, is this moment where v'kol dimamah dakah yishama, "a still small voice goes out and," malachim yechafezun, "the angels are struck by fear."

We get to understand that somehow that still small voice is revelatory, it's revelation, its epitome is God, hakadosh baruch hu. And what I want to do with you today is to explore the nature of that still small voice, because that small voice comes from somewhere, it comes from sefer melachi.

Connections to the Text of Unetaneh Tokef in the Bible

So what we are going to do today is undertake an exploration of the story involving Elijah the prophet and the still small voice; we're going to look at the story of the still small voice.

It's a fascinating, sort of strange story, we are going to chart some of the fascinating elements of it and see what we make of it. And then when we are done, maybe come back and see what its implications for Unetaneh Tokef is.

So here is the story, you can find it in your, if you go home and you want to do this one your own, you could find this in maluchim yud tet, Kings 19. And the setting for the story is, this is right after what you might argue is the dramatic climax of Elijah's prophetic career, the great, almost game show as it were; on top of Har HaKarmel is the closest thing to a game show that you can imagine.

In the Torah, it's where Elijah issues a challenge to finally decide who is the true God, the Baal as it were, or God himself. Ad mata atem poschim al shtei seifim – we'll see how long will you, what's the word? Prevaricate? Will you... I can't remember the word in English; will you straddle? Straddle two sides of the fence, two sides of the sword.

And he invites the prophets of Baal for this showdown and you all know the story – he built two altars and the prophets of Baal visiting team so they get to go first and they call out to God to answer him to their God to answer them and of course nothing happens. Elijah taunts them, maybe sleeping, you have to wake him up, and still nothing happens. And finally, Elijah called out to God after drenching his offering just to make it fair, the idea that the winner will have fire come down from heaven and consume the offering.

Fire comes down from heaven, consumes the wet offering and everyone says, Hashem hu haElokim, Hashem hu haElokim, something we all say today in Yom Kippur and it seems like the great climax, much as Hashem hu Elokim is the great climax of our davening on Yom Kippur; it seems like the story is over. And then it rains. Elijah had declared there would be no rain for three years.

It always bothers me by the way, why that was the case? Why did Elijah decree there would be no rain? Because it seems like such a mean thing to do, sort of collective punishment, what's he doing? Punishing all the people because some people are worshiping Baal? It doesn't seem like a very nice thing.

But then actually I was in Israel, I recommend that you do this, go the Israeli Museum, go to Room 5 in the archeology section of the Israeli Museum and you will find a fascinating thing, you will actually shed light on this story. Room 5 is Biblical Archeology around the times of Melachim; you can see a lot of interesting things, you can actually see the palace gates from Chatzor palace, the king that lived at the time of Elijah. You could find weight and measures so it makes a lot of sense. It's got gerim and shekel you can actually see a gerah weight and you can a shekel weight, you can see that the gerah is about one twenty the size of a shekel; it's really very fascinating. You can see Abram talks about arba meah shekel kesef you can get a sense of what that shekel really was.

One of the things that you see in Room 5 of the Israeli Museum, you see little statutes of Baal that were worshiped at the time and his wife, a woman by the name of Asherah actually, when the Torah talks about "don't worship the Asherah, Asherah would be the wife of Baal."

In ancient Canaanite religion, you know God Baal was, Baal was actually the storm God. So it makes a lot of sense what Elijah was doing. What Elijah was saying that you think that Baal controls the rain, Baal controls the storms, Baal doesn't control the storm; ki ani notarti navi laHashem – I'm the prophet of God, God controls the storms. That was really the idea. That was only once the people gave up the worship of Baal, that's when the rain came at the very end of the story.

Anyway, this seems to be the great vindication of Elijah as a prophet and it's almost like, if Sefer Melachim ended here, you wouldn't be upset, you would think "Ah! The story has ended, everything is great." However, I don't know if you have ever read a book or a novel or something, sometimes you have a very successful author, they write a great book, the book ends when the good guy wins, and yet they want to write a sequel because the first book was so good. So how are you going to write a sequel when the good guys won, you're stuck. So what do you have to do? You start the sequel with "well, that wasn't really the whole story, the good guys won the battle but there was a larger war, they were the good guys in the war, here is the larger story and you kind of feel like something like that seems to be going on in the beginning of our new story of Melachim yud tet. It's like Elijah's dramatic victory seems to just fade, and you meet Elijah, and he is on the land, and he is on the run, and it looks like he's down and it looks almost as if the climax has never happened. And that's the setting for our story with the Unetaneh Tokef. So let's read over here and see what we make of this.

Vayaged Achav l'Izevel et kol-asher asah Eliyahu – "So Ahab the wicked king told him even wickeder wife Jezebel, kol-asher asah Eliyahu, everything that Elijah had done, et kol-asher harag et-kol-hanevi'im becharev – how he had killed all the prophets by the sword, vatishlach Izevel malach el-Eliyahu lemor – "and so Jezebel sends the messenger to Elijah telling him, koh yaasun Elokim v'koh yosifun. In Tanach what does it mean, koh yaasun Elokim v'koh yosifun? Speak with the language of shvuah that's how the people would take an oath, "Thus should God do and thus should he continue to do." But if you look at how Jezebel phrase the language, you will find something a little bit different than the way it normally is in Tanach. It's not koh yaaseh Elokim v'koh yosif, but, it's plural koh yaasun Elokim v'koh yosifun. Why is that? Because who is Jezebel? She is a polytheists. She believes in many gods. So when she swears in the name of the god, it's not in the name of the one God, it's in the name of many gods. So she puts them in plural, "so shall the Gods do, and so will they continue to do", she is swearing by the gods. Ki-kaet machar asim et-nafshecha kenefesh ached mehem – "By tomorrow I will kill you, I will treat you the way you have treated the other prophets of Baal".

Now we have a series of very strange events. Vayar vayakam vayelech el-nafsho – Elijah sees, he gets up he goes", what does vayelech el-nafsho mean? "He goes to himself, maybe he runs for his life", although vayelech el-nafsho would not be exactly the way you said, 'you're running for your life', it literally means that "you're running to your life, or you're running to yourself". Anyway, but vayavo Beer Sheva – "He comes to Beer Sheva". Asher liyhudah vayanach et-naaro sham, seem to be details that's not important, vayanach et-naaro sham – "He leaves his lad behind there." First of all, we didn't even know he was travelling with a lad , the lad never shows up again in the story, it doesn't seem important that he left him behind or have him there in the first place, so why do we even need to know this?

Anyway, it gets a little stranger. Vehu halach bamidbar derech yom – "He goes for a day's journey into the desert", vayavo yayeshev tachat rotem echad – "and he goes and he sits under a Rotom tree" , vayishal et-nafsho lamut vayomer rav atah Hashem kach nafshi ki-lo-tov anochi meavotai – "He say, God take my soul from me, I am no better than my forefathers" vayishkav vayishan tachat rotem echad – " he falls asleep underneath this Rotom tree, and he is asleep", vehineh zeh malach nogea bo – " and then a malach comes," notice we had a malach earlier on also, but there the malach was a messenger, here the malach was an angel. So an angel come, nogea bo – "and touches him". Vayomer lo kum echol – " and the malach mysteriously says, wake up, it's time to eat." Vayabet – "so he look", v'hineh meraashtav ugat retzafim v'tzafachat mayim – " he arise, he goes, he looks up and there is this cake , there is this big cake on the coal up above his head hanging on the tree", V'tzafachat mayim – " there is this canteen of water" vayochal vayesht - and he goes and he eats, and what happens next? Vayashav vayishkav – "and now he goes back to sleep", like what is this? Like now we've got a really tired Elijah. Why is he sleeping so much? Anyway, so now he is asleep for a second time. Vayashav malach Hashem, the malach doesn't give up. So the malach goes , and a second time goes, vayiga bo vayomer kum echol "He say, you've got to get up and eat some more." Like what is this? Why are we hearing about all this? Elijah is tired, he gets up, eats a little bit, goes back to sleep, gets up , eat a little", what are we supposed to make of all of this?

Vayiga bo vayomer kum echol– "Go, get up and eat", ki rav mimcha haderech – " you have a long way to go yet." What do you mean, "You have a long way to go yet"? What does that mean? Vayakam vayochal vayishteh vayelech bekoach ha'achilah hahi arbaim yom v'arbaim laylah – "He gets something and he goes, and he goes for forty days and forty nights just on the basis of ad har haElokim Chorev – we get to the mountain of God and Horeb. Vayavo-sham el-hamearah "and he comes to his cave there, then he's going to have this epiphany where God is going to appear to him and he will hear a still small voice. So, the first thing I want to do is try to analyze what we've just read, these strange events, try to make sense of what's happening with Elijah, kind of going off in the desert, falling asleep, angel trying to wake him up, angle not being so successful, eating a little bit, eating a little bit again, falling asleep; what exactly is happening? What are we supposed to make of all that and how does it contribute to our story?

How Does This Commentary Relate to Unetaneh Tokef?

Here is what we're going to do, we're going to go back and read these pasukim one more time. But as we read them one more time, we're going to play one of my favorite games, and yours, and it is called, 'Where have we heard these words before?' Basically what the Torah is doing here is that ever once in a while, well let me give you a little bit of a background; I see some new faces in the crowd, I don't know if you all really good with me, but here is the background to that little piece of methodology.

Imagine you are on a plane to Egypt and you meet my mythical friend that I call 'Joe' on the plane and Joe had got these questions for you and Joe says, "I understand you Jews, you are the people of the book, do you believe the Bible is deep?" You say, "Yes, of course. I believe the Bible is very deep." Joe says, "I have a problem with that idea; the Bible is too short." You say, "What do you mean the Bible is too short? It's a very long Bible." He says, "No, you don't understand. All the stories in the Bible, they are too short. These are suppose to be dramatic stories and something very important, Adam and Eve in the garden, the Tower of Babel, the binding of Isaac; look at these stories. Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden is twelve verse long, the Tower of Babel is nine verses long, the Akeida is twelve verses long. These are such deep stories. Imagine if the Encyclopedia Britannica was writing about one of these fifty years ago, do you think it would be twelve verses long? It would be fifty columns long." What are you going to say in nine sentences even if I was a really bright guy, no matter how bright I am, how much can I pack into nine sentences that three thousand years from now, millions of people around the world will think that this is such a deep document, what's so deep? What can you say in nine sentences? What would you answer Joe on the plane? Not such an easy question. What would you say to Joe on the plane? You would look for another seat, right? But, what if there were no other seats?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:16:03]

Rabbi: You would say "there is a lot of hidden meaning". But Joe says, "yes, I don't get that. What do you mean there is a lot of "hidden meanings"? What do you mean? Like, it's words on a page, so where is the hidden meaning? So then you might say, "well, that's what the meforshim are for. There is Rashi and there is Sforno, you don't understand there is the Rambam." So what would Joe say to that? Would Joe be impressed with that? Joe would not be impressed with that. He says, "okay, fine. They can say whatever they want but the text, you're telling me the text is meaningful, I don't want to know a lot of people say maybe this, maybe that, but where is the meaning of the text itself? It must be that there is a lot of hidden meaning, but where do that meaning come from? How do you get inner meaning in texts?"

The analogy I always give to this is imagine you were very, very rich, and you are looking for a place to live in Manhattan and you decided that you wanted a five thousand square feet ranch house with a really nice backyard and you tell your real estate agent that money is no object, but you must have a beautiful five thousand square foot ranch house with an idyllic backyard, somewhere in Manhattan and between say E 60th and Fifth Avenue, somewhere through the mid-town area, somewhere in there. So what's your real estate agent is going to say? "Well it's not there." "But I'm telling you, I am willing to pay any amount of money!" It's still not there. For no amount of money is there a beautiful ranch with a backyard in mid-town. So your real estate agent might come back to you and say looks, "if you want five thousand square feet and money is no object, I can give it to you in Manhattan but I can't give you the Ranch house. How can I give you five thousand square feet of housing in Manhattan? The answer is a high rise. I can give you a high rise apartment. I can give you an apartment, a very nice apartment with four floors and you can have your five thousand square feet of living space. And of course, space is at a premium in Manhattan. So when space is at a premium, what do you do? You build up.

So maybe space is at a premium in the Torah too, space is at a premium in the Torah. If you want depth, what do you do? You build up. Maybe the Torah builds up, which is to say, maybe there is layers of meaning in the Torah. There is only nine sentences, but that's just the footprint of the skyscraper; the skyscraper has levels. What does it mean to say that there are levels and meanings in the Torah? That's a very nice esoteric concept, but what does it actually mean when you talk about levels?

When we talk about levels of meanings, I think there is many different tools that the Torah uses to layer meaning in it's text. Today I am going to talk to you about one of those tools, I think there are maybe ten or so of those tools. These are tools which the Midrash uses, you'll find the Midrash using them even here but the Midrash doesn't tell you they are using this. The Midrash is not there to there to teach you methodology, the Midrash is there to teach you what the Midrash thinks. The Midrash don't use methodology. One of the methodological tools which we are going to use today, is this tool I call 'where have we heard these words before' academics call intertextuality and basically the way it works is, every once in a while, you are going to be reading a story in Tanach and there is going to be this strange word of phrase that strikes you and you are going to say to yourself, "oh, I've heard these words before. This reminds me of something in Joshua perek lamed." And then you are reading the story again in Melachim and then there will be this other word or phrase and lo and behold it also reminds you of something else and you look it up and it's also in Joshua perek lamed. And then there is this other phrase and it reminds you of something else in Joshua perek lamed. And pretty soon you come to the conclusion that this isn't an accident, that the Torah is actually meaning to connect these two events. The Torah is creating a layer. It's saying, "If you want to understand what's happening in the story, you need to understand it in reference to Joshua perek lamed.It's almost like creating another analogy, you can say this is binocular vision. Why do you have two eyes? Have you ever wondered why you have two eyes? One eye would have been good enough. Whatever you see with one eye, you see with two eyes, so why did God bother to give you two eyes? What's the answer to that question?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:20:27]

Rabbi: Depth perception. It's not that the other eye is insurance just in case you lose the first one. The second eye actually contribute something. If you close your eye and look out of one eye, you can try this, you see everything but you see it kind of 'flatish'. One of the ways that we perceive depth is that if we have two eyes, we can perceive depth. How? Because each of your eye actually is seeing something slightly different because your eyes are set in different parts of your head. So what's happening is that your brain is actually taking two different layers of information and kind of layering them on top of each other and making one vision out of it. And you know what happens when you do that? You get a sensation of depth. That's how we build depth. So really the answer to Joe literally is when you are asked, "Why is the Torah deep?" The idea of literary depth or depth in text, is not really do different than the idea of depth perception in sight or even depth perception in sound. It's the same idea with stereo sounds. Every wonder how stereo speakers work or how stereo headphones work? Because the sound that you get from the right hand speaker, is slightly different from the sound you get from the left hand speaker and when your brain put those two together, you get the experience of depth. So something like that is happening in text when the Torah layers each story on top of each other. Let's try and see if we can discern any kind of layers in the text we just read.

Layers of Meaning: Connecting Elijah to Jonah

Let's start with pasuk gimel over here, I am going to highlight it for you right over here. In this little pasuk you have at least six references to another story in chumash. Let's see if we can find out what they are. What does this reminds us of? Let's listen carefully. Vayar vayakam vayelech el-nafsho. Kind of like those verbs over and over again. What?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:22:12]

Rabbi: It reminds you of Akeidat Yitzchak, okay. In Akeidat Yitzchak, you have those kinds of verbs, you have those three verbs. So you might say, "Well, one second! Vayar appears a million times in the Torah, vayakam appears a million times in the Torah, vayelech, that's true but the combination of them don't appear a million times. The combination of them appear in the Akeidah and they appear here and a couple other smaller points in the Torah. But let's take a look at these. Vayar vayakam vayelech el-nafsho, now, is there anything else, we will get back to the Akeidah in a moment, but is there anything else in this passage that reminds you of the Akeidah besides vayar vayakam vayelech?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:22:48]

Rabbi: Good! The idea of leaving your naar somewhere, of course in the Akeidah, what does that Abram do? He leaves his naar somewhere. Going on up on the way to the mountain, he leaves ani venaar nochad, and then he goes and he leaves his naar. What else? Is there any other element besides vayar vayakam vayelech and vayanach et-naaro sham? That of course is Beer Sheva. Beer Sheva plays a little cameo role in the Akeidah, where is Beer Sheva, it's at the very end of the Akeidah and it's as they are leaving, Abram is going to Beer Sheva and that's what happens. So we're going to come back to the pasuk in a moment, but let's just not that vayar vayakam vayelech and Beer Sheva and leaving his naar there, are things that are reminiscent of the Akeidah and we'll come back and try to understand what we make of that within a moment. Let's go on to the next pasuk and see if we find anything there.

Vehu halach bamidbar derech yom vayavo yayeshev tachat rotem echad vayishal et-nafsho lamut vayomer rav atah Hashem kach nafshi ki-lo-tov anochi meavotai. Let's look at this pasuk here.

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:24:07]

Rabbi: Alright. So one second, what story does this reminds us of?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:24:12]

Rabbi: Most of you were saying Jonah. Why are you telling me Jonah? Could we have a volunteer who said Jonah? Does someone want to tell me why you said Jonah?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:24:25]

Rabbi: Okay. So the idea of the death wish reminds us of Jonah. Does just the existence of a death wish reminds you of Jonah or does the language of the death wish reminds you of Jonah?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:24:35]

Rabbi: It's really actually the language of the death wish that also reminds you of Jonah. For example, Jonah also said these very words, kach nafshi mimeni, and then there is the tone also with Jonah but a little bit different, ki tov motzi mechayai, that's what Jonah said. "Take my life from me because death is better than life." With Elijah it's a little bit different, kach nafshi ki-lo-tov anochi meavotai. So the death wish reminds you. Is there anything else about this that reminds you of Jonah?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:25:10]

Rabbi: Okay, good. He is under a tree. Where was Jonah also when he made his death wish? Jonah was also under a tree. So you have two prophets, under a tree, having this sort of death wish. Now, take a look, if you go a little bit further, what happens underneath this tree? What did Elijah get under the tree?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:25:41]

Rabbi: He gets food and he sleeps, he doesn't get shade, it didn't say he get shade, but he has food and drink that is hanging off the tree. What does Jonah get from the tree?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0: 25:55]

Rabbi: Jonah gets shade. So the shade is kind of this life giving thing that comes from God and here also, you get a different life giving thing, but there is this life giving thing that comes from God; there is this food that comes from the tree. Yes?

Audience: [unintelligible, 0:26:10]

Rabbi: Okay, possibly. So let's hold off on that. Vehu halach bamidbar derech yom. What does that remind of you of Jonah?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:26:26]

Rabbi: Remember this is a little tiny piece of the Jonah naarrative. Did Jonah ever walk a day's journey in Sefer Yonah? Elijah walks a day's journey, did Jonah ever walked a day's journey?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:26:38]

Rabbi: Yes! If you look carefully Jonah, Jonah, the Torah says, is mehalach shloshet yamim is a great city that takes three days to traverse the entire city of Nineveh. How far does Jonah goes into it? He goes mehalach yom echad - "he goes one day's walk in", and lo and behold, here you have Elijah who also travelling one day. So you have Elijah travelling one day, sitting under a tree, wishing to die, and Jonah you have Jonah travelling one day, sitting under a tree, wishing to die. It's almost as if the scene is shifted, partnering with the Akeidah, then all of a sudden we are with Jonah.

Okay, so now what I want to do is go back and we're going to look at this a little more carefully. Let's go back to our Akeidah over here and really take a look at it for a moment because what I want to show you now is that there are actually, we talk about layers of meaning in texts, there is what I want to call a 'middle layer' of meaning as well, which is there is a layer of meaning above the connectors between Jonah and Elijah and the Akeida and Elijah.

That middle layer is that there is a pattern within the pattern which is, as you look at the nature of the patterns that exists, connecting Elijah to the Akeidah, you will find that there is something about the way the pattern works that reminds you about a quirky thing in the way the Elijah and Jonah connection works as well. Let's see if we can find this quirky twist in the pattern. Let's look and examine carefully pasuk gimel, let me get it for you on the screen, and let's put them actually up against the Akeida, if we can, let me see if I can do that for you, let me put this over here, and we will put the Akeida up over here. I know this looks confusing, but it's going to get less confusing in just a moment. Here is the Akeida and here is Elijah.

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:29:03]

Rabbi: You're impressed, huh? Okay. So we're going to put them side by side here. So here is pasuk gimel over here in Melachim over here, and we are going to compare this to the Akeida. The first thing that we are going to look at is the vayar vayakam vayelech. So let's find that in the Akeida. Let's go back to the Akeida for a moment and see if we can find it, and here we got it. It also happens in pasuk gimel, just a coincidence, vayashkem Avraham baboker vayachavosh et-chamoro vayikach et-shnei ne'arav ito ve'et Yitzchak beno vayevaka atzei olah, what do you have? Vayakom vayelech el-hamakom asher-amar-lo haElokim. Now notice what you don't have is vayar. Do you have a vayar?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:29:58]

Rabbi: You do, but not exactly here. You have the vayar right over here. Do you see that? So you've got the vayar vayakom vayelech separated. So what you will say is that this is true that you have these connections between these three verbs in order, but these three verbs, vayar vayakom vayelech, but the orders are a little mixed up. In the Melachim it's vayar vayakom vayelech, in the Akeida it's vayakom vayelech and vayar. Now, let's go a little bit further. Let's look at the role of Beer Sheva, our next connection, vayavo Beer Sheva. Let's look at the role of Beer Sheva in both stories. What is the role of Beer Sheva in the Elijah story? What happens in Beer Sheva?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:30:43]

Rabbi: Elijah return, no, in Melachim story, what did Elijah do at Beer Sheva?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:30:50]

Rabbi: He runs to Beer Sheva and he is about to have an epiphany before God. On his way towards an epiphany with God, he is running to Beer Sheva. And let's find Beer Sheva in the Akeida, and you will find, Vayashov Avraham el-ne'arav vayakumu vayelchu yachdav el-Beer-sheva vayeshev Avraham bi'Beer-sheva. It's all the way at the end and it's sort of the opposite. After you have this epiphany towards God, you end up going to Beer Sheva. Now, here is another interesting thing. Let's go to vayanach et-naaro sham. What is it that Elijah does in Beer Sheva? "Vayanach et-naaro sham" – "He parts from his naar." Let's listen to what Abram does in Beer Sheva. Isn't that interesting? Vayashov Avraham el-ne'arav – Abram returns to his naar. Abram actually reunites with his naar and then gets up and go to Beer Sheva, exactly the opposite of what Elijah does in the Akeida where he is going to Beer Sheva and leaving behind his naar.

So, Elijah goes to Beer Sheva after an epiphany, leaves behind his naar. Abram goes to Beer Sheva, sorry, Elijah goes to Beer Sheva before the epiphany leaves behind his naar, Abram, after the epiphany, meets up with his naar in Beer Sheva.

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:32:22]

Rabbi: That's true. There are many naar, that's true. Okay, are you with me? No? You're not with me? You're with me? Okay. Now, let's go back and notice that the vayar vayakam vayelech got switched around too with Elijah vayar vayakam vayelech; with Abram, vayakam vayelech vayar. What pattern are you starting to see with the connection between the Elijah story and the Akeida story? They are connected but they are reversed. So strange, we have connections but we have reverse connections. Now let's go, and we have a scene shift. All of a sudden , the next pasuk we also hear connectors to another story, but it's not the Akeida story, it's the Jonah story. Let's see what we find in the Jonah story. So we're going to get rid of the Akeidanow. Bye Akeida, we'll come back to you. Hadrah nalach Akeida, and we're back in Melachim.

Vehu halach bamidbar derech yom vayavo yayeshev tachat rotem echad vayishal et-nafsho lamut vayomer rav atah Hashem kach nafshi ki-lo-tov anochi meavotai. Okay, so one interesting thing is, even though there is a death wish here, kach nafshi, if we look at what Jonah said in that death wish, what Jonah said is,"kach-na et-nafshi mimeni ki tov moti mechayai, right. And in this little kind of twist, Elijah kind of says the opposite which is "ki-lo-tov anochi meavotai". Alright, so that's just a little twist. I want to actually go on for a moment.

We notice the pasuk dalet reminds us of Jonah. I want to go further now into pasuk hey, we'll come back to pasuk dalet, I want to go further into pasuk hey and ask ourselves, "do these reminisces of other stories keep on happening?" Do we hear anything in the next pasuk that reminds us of these stories too? "Vayishkav vayishan tachat rotem echad" – "And he goes and he sleeps underneath the tree," "vehineh zeh malach nogea bo" –"and a malach comes and touches him," "Vayomer lo kum echol" – "The malach touches him and says, get up and eat." "v'hineh meraashtav ugat retzafim v'tzafachat mayim vayochal vayesht vayashav vayishkav" – "And he goes and he sees this canteen of water and he drinks" "Vayishkav vayishan" – " and he goes back to sleep." "Vayashav malach Hashem sheinit" – "And then the angel comes again," "vayiga bo" – " and wakes him up again, touches him again", "vayomer kum echol" – " get up", "ki rav mimcha haderech" – " because you have a long way to go."

So now my question to you is this, what other story in Tanach do you know, one second, hold on a minute, don't raise your hand yet, what other story in Tanach do you know where you have a person, a prophet, who falls asleep at a crucial moment of the story, then another person comes and tries desperately to wake him up only to have that prophet, so to speak, seek "sleep again"? And only to be frustrated one more time by an emissary of God? What story does this reminds you of? Jacob? Not Jacob.

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:35:45]

Rabbi: The answer is, trick question, it's Jonah again. It's Jonah on the ship. Remember Jonah on the ship? Jonah on the ship, also very similar. What happen to Jonah on the ship? Let's go back to Jonah on the ship. Remember? Jonah falls asleep and Jonah is then woken up by the Rav Hachovel and then, what does Jonah tried to do? Let's set the scene. Actually, let's go to Jonah for a moment and we can compare the too again. Here we have Melachim on one side, and we have, where had my Jonah gone? That's not Jonah. Here is Jonah, okay, you with me? You've got Jonah here. So let's go to Jonah falling asleep on the ship. Jonah falling asleep on the ship is right over here. So there is this storm, have you ever wondered by the way, there is this storm, everyone is very scared, there is a saar gadol bayam v'haaniyah chishvah lehishaver – this huge storm, everyone is calling out to God, where is Jonah? "Vayishkav vayeradam," "Jonah went down into the hole and took a nap." Does that strike you as a little odd? Here you have a divine inspired, perfect storm, imagine yourself, you're in a fifth century BC fishing vessel, there is this huge storm outside, you have the boat going up on these waves and literally in about to capsize , can you imagine, "Oh, it's time for my mid afternoon nap." Like here I am, can you sleep if you tried? Here is Jonah at the bottom of the ship sleeping. Why is Jonah sleeping?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:37:57]

Rabbi: He had bitacham. Okay, let's take the bitachem theory. Here is the bitachem theory. Vayikrav elav rav hachovel, so here comes the caption, mah-lecha nirdam "you must be dumb, what are you doing sleeping?" Kum kra el-Elokeicha, "Go call out to God, maybe God will answer us." So, what happens? Jonah goes up on top of the deck, everyone is calling out to God, did Jonah pray?

Audience: No.

Rabbi: Jonah did not pray. Like the one true prophet of God, all the goyim are very frum; Jonah is not praying. What's going on? What's really the answer to this question?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:38:39]

Rabbi: Are we supposed to pray with goyim if you're on a ship and you got to be saved…

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:38:45]

Rabbi: I want to suggest a theory to you. You know Chazal about the fish? Imagine that you are on the plane with Jonah, you know what I'm talking about? How many fish were there in the story? You know what I am talking about? The first time the fish appeared it's a dag, it's a dag. The second time the fish appears it's a dagah. You know what the Chazal say?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:39:14]

Rabbi: You know this song right? First, Jonah was in a male fish, then he wasn't davening in a male fish, so Hakadosh Baruch Hu made the male fish sort of mouth to mouth resuscitation, spits Jonah into the female fish, female fish was pregnant, not a lot of room in the female fish and that's when Jonah prayed.

Now imagine trying this out on Joe on the plane. "Joe, you know how many fish there were in Jonah? There were actually two fish the Rabbi say. Now really Joe. First he was in the male fish." Joe will think you are crazy.

What are the Rabbis saying? What do they mean by this? What are the Rabbis saying? I think what the Rabbis are saying is look carefully at the text and what do they see? What they saw was a pattern. The pattern is, why is Jonah falling asleep? He's falling asleep because he knows what the storm is. What's the storm? The storm is God. So if the storm is God, what is Jonah doing? Jonah is running away.

The whole point is he's boreach melifnei Hashem – "He is running away from God." So the storm is God, God saying, "Jonah, we've got to talk." What's Jonah saying? "I am not interested in talking. So I am going to sleep. I know it's very difficult to sleep. It doesn't make a difference. I am going to sleep." Jonah goes to sleep and unfortunately for Jonah, the rav hachovel wakes him up and so he can't escape on the ship, and he can't escape into sleep. So the next thing that happened is, the people go and they say, "What shall we do with you?" And what did Jonah say? Throw me overboard.

Now remember, Jonah does not know what we know, which is, that there is a fish waiting for him. So if Jonah doesn't know what we know, and he knows that there is a storm out there; divinely sent storm, what is he really saying "throw me overboard"? He's saying, "kill me if you have to." What he is really saying to God in a certain way is, "I'm running away from you. If you're not going to let me run away on the boat, and you're not going to let me run away into sleep, I'll run away into another sleep, into a death kind of sleep." However, Jonah is frustrated in that too because there is another emissary of God which is waiting for him, which is the fish. Jonah is not being allowed to sleep. He's not being allowed to sleep the first time, and he is not being allowed to sleep the second time. And what Chazal say that he even prayed in the fish, all Chazal were doing was extending the cycle one step further. They saw the pattern and say, even when he was in the fish, he wasn't going to pray and actually being cornered, and literally having no more room physically, spiritually in the second fish, that's when Jonah prayed. But the point is, do you see the parallel with Elijah, right? Elijah tries to sleep, there is a divine emissary that wakes him up. Elijah tries to sleep again, there is a divine emissary that wakes him up. In Jonah's case, the name of the divine emissary is the malach. In the Elijah story, the name of the divine emissary is the rav hachovel; is the captain of the ship. The first one is the rav hachovel, the second one is the fish.

Now here is the interesting thing. You might say that a rav hachovel has nothing to do with an angel. But if you actually think about it carefully, the captain of the ship does have something to do with an angel because, who is the captain of the ship? The captain of a ship of who?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:42:28]

Rabbi: Of sailors. What's the word for sailors?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:42:32]

Rabbi: That's right. It's a play on words. But what are the sailors called in Jonah? If you look at the sailors, you can find it right over here, notice what the sailors are called, spelled differently, but the sailors are called malachim, play on words. So there is the head malach as it were that wakes up Jonah, and then there is the malach of course in the Elijah story that wakes up Elijah. By the way, also notice that, what does the malach say in the story of Jonah? In the story of Jonah, I'm sorry, in the story of Elijah. First of all, notice what Elijah says, "vayashal et-nafsho lamut vayomer rav atah Hashem kach nafshi mimeni," "It's enough for me God, take my soul from me and then the malach catches them the second time, here is that word again,"lech echol ki rav mimecha haderech" , you hear that? Rav in Elijah's voice, rav in the angel's voice. What was the name of the head sailor? Rav hachovel. So the Torah is going out of its way to create all these little connections between these stories. But here is the fascinating thing, look at the letter pattern. We go back too our story of Melachim, if we go back tour story of Elijah now, and we look together at pasuk dalet and pasuk hey, pasuk dalet is Elijah going for a day's journey, wanting to die, and saying "take my soul from me". What story does that reminds us of? Jonah. Jonah where? Jonah underneath the tree.

Now we look at pasuk hey when he falls asleep and he falls asleep again, and he gets woken up, he gets another woken up, what story does this reminds us of? Jonah. Where in Jonah? Jonah on the boat. And now look at the letter pattern, which story happens first in the story of Jonah? The ship. First the ship then the tree. What is happening in our story? First the tree then the ship. Does it reminds you of something? It reminds you of the same letter pattern as the Akeidah. In the Akeidah, you have reverse parallels going in the Akeidah. In Jonah, you have reverse parallels going in Jonah. What's going on?

Let's continue one more time and read another pasuk of the story of Elijah and ask ourselves again, does this reminds us of anything else? Do we here memories of any other story? Alright, so let's go. We're up to pasuk chet right now. Vayakam vayochal vayishteh vayelech bechoach haachilah hahi arbaim yom ve'arbaim laylah ad har haElokim chorev – so he went, he got up and he ate and he went for forty days and forty nights until he got to the mountain of God and he got to Horeb. Okay, anybody?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:45:32]

Rabbi: No eating for forty days and forty nights and association with the mountain of God and Horeb, answer? Moses. Moses also did not eat, "lechem lo ochalti mayim lo shatiti arbaim yom ve'arbaim laylah", Moses says, "I didn't eat for forty days and forty night." When? "Ba'aloti haharah" – "When I went up the mountain." So you have Elijah going up the mountain, the same mountain, Horeb, going forty days and forty nights without eating, a little bit of a difference which is, when does Moses not eat? When he is on top of the mountain, when did Elijah not eat? When he is on the way to the mountain, maybe a little reverse there but let's keep on reading. Vayavo-sham el-hamarah – "And then he comes to," translate those words for me anyone

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:46:25]

Rabbi: One more time.

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:46:25]

Rabbi: Why are you look so quizzical? No one knows what this word means? He comes to the cave. So he goes to the cave. Now is there anything strange here about this word? Is this how you would write it?

Audience: No.

Rabbi: Vayavo-sham el-hamarah, okay, I'll live with sham. Sham is on Horeb, when he went el-hamarah – "to the cave", anything strange about that?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:46:56]

Rabbi: Good. Say that again.

Audience: Why is this hamarah?

Rabbi: Right! Why is it hamarah? Do you understand? If you tell me vayavo sham el-marah I would understand, and if Elijah found the cave and he went into a cave, what do you mean, 'he went into the cave'? 'The Cave' implies what? It implies a specific cave, it implies "you know what cave". What do you mean, "You know what cave"? Now enter Chazal. You know what Chazal say in the Megillah? It says, "do you know what this cave was?" This was, not marat hamachelah, not on Horeb. That's right. Chazal says in the story of the Megillah that this was the mikrat hatzur – the crevice of the rock that Moses was in when Moses experienced an epiphany on Horeb. Now you say, "How did Chazal know that? It's obvious how Chazal knew it because Chazal saw all these connections. Chazal understood the story was connected to the Moses story, they saw the literary connections, and then if you say hamarah, well of course we know what hamarah is, it's the case. Well what cave? It's the cave that you always experience the epiphany of God at Horeb. Where else are you going to go at Horeb, if you want to meet God? You go to the cave, you go to Moses cave, that's how Chazal reads it. Suddenly he goes to the cave, vayalen sham vehineh devar-Hashem elav vayomer lo mah-lecha poh Eliyahu. So then the dvar-Hashem comes to him and he says, and then dvar-Hashem says, "mah-lecha poh Eliyahu". Now notice, we're running out of time, so I am going to try to say this quickly. We have our next speaker coming up in about ten minutes. So Elijah comes and he says, God says, "mah-lecha poh Eliyahu" which is a strange thing. What are you doing here Elijah? That's certainly not the way that Moses was received; what are you doing here Moses? Let's see if we can go back to the epiphany story with Moses for a moment.

"Ve'atah im-na matzati chen be'eineicha hodi'eni na et-derachcha ve'eda'acha lema'an emtza-chen be'eineichakure'eh ki amecha hagoy hazeh" – "If I've found favor in your eyes, let me understand your way so I can know you, so I can understand you, so I can leave the Jews, effectively, and I also want you to see ki amecha hagoy hazeh". Now this is also very interesting with Moses, because remember, what offering had God made to Moses? The offering that God made to Moses was hanichah li veyichar-api vahem va'achalem – leave me alone and I will start over with you", ve'e'eseh otcha legoy gadol – " and I will make you into a great nation." What was Moses really saying? Moses said, I want this direct connection with you. I like that idea but, "ure'eh ki amecha hagoy hazeh" – "the people are sinners, the people have sinned, but they are yours God. You can't quit on them now, and you can't get away with that. So the people are yours." So God then says, "gam et-hadavar hazeh asher dibarta e'eseh ki-matzata chen be'einay va'eda'acha beshem har'eni na et-kvodecha ani a'avir kol-tuvi al-paneicha vekarati veshem Hashem lefaneicha vechanoti et-asher achon verichamti et-asher arachem lo tuchal lir'ot et-panay ki lo-yir'ani ha'adam vachay hineh makom iti venitzavta al-hatzur vehayah ba'avor kvodi vesamticha benikrat hatzur vesakoti chapi aleicha ad-ovri." You see a lot of these themes coming up in Elijah's epiphany as well, the idea that he is not really going to be able to see God, he is only going to be able to see God's back, vahasiroti et-kapi vera'ita et-achorai ufanai lo yera'u. Let's go to Elijah's epiphany, you'll see similar kinds of things.

Vayavo sham el-hamarah rav hapoh Eliyahu is different. "Vayomer kano kineti laHashem" –"what are you doing here?" Listens to Elihah's answer, "I acted zealous on behalf of God", azvu britecha benei Yisrael et-mizbechotecha harasu v'et-nevieicha hargu becharev," " the Jews have left your covenant, they have destroyed your prophets," "va'ivater ani levadi" – " I am the only one left", "vayevakshu et-nafshi lekachtah" – " and they want to kill me too." What about this reminds you of Moses?

Va'ivater ani levadi reminds you of Moses because remember, Moses after the egal also is really alone. God said, it's going to be just you, I am going to throw everyone out. Elijah is sort of setting himself up in the very Moses like role, it's just me, everyone else has died; very similar to the egal, right? The Jews have worshipped some other God, I'm acting zealously on behalf of God, that's what I am doing here. What's God's answer? God's answer is "Vayomer tze ve'amadta bahar lifnei Hashem v'hineh Hashem over", same thing as the epiphany with Moses. "God is going to pass before you, and there is going to be a whole lot if things and you are not going to see God." But then there is going to be something and you're going to see God. Veruach bedolah vechazak mefarek harim - "there is going to be this great wind that is going to shatter rocks", lifnei Hashem lo varuach Hashem – "but God is not in the wind." Va'achar haruach raash – "and after there is going to be this great thunder" Lo varaash Hashem – " and after the rash, esh, there is going to be fire", velo baesh Hashem – "but after the fire," and here is unetaneh tokef, "kol demamah dakah" – " there is going to be this still small voice."

Now if you look at the three things where there is not Hashem, what are those three things? Those three things are the ruach, this great shattering ruach, there's esh, and raash. Now if you add all that up together, what would you say that equals to? There is great wind, there is great thunder and there is fire. So you would say a storm, except it's not a normal storm, a normal storm is a rain storm, it's a water storm, here , it's the opposite of rain storm; it's a fire storm. By the way, going back to Jonah, did we have a storm? We sure had a storm but there it was a rain storm, it was a water storm. Who was the water storm? The water storm actually was God. If you take all these elements together, God is saying there is a storm, it's a fire storm, but God is not in the fire storm.

By the way, think of storms in Jonah, saar is the Hebrew word for storm, that's what it was in Jonah. Do we every have a saar or a saarah, a storm with Elijah? Is there ever a storm, a saarah with Elijah?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:54:00]

Rabbi: At the very end of Elijah's life, he ascends to shamayim in what? It says there is a saarah gedol, there's a saarah that comes and susei esh – and there are horses of fire, it's a fire storm that is coming to take Elijah to heaven. What is the fire storm? God. Do you understand the paradox over here? At the end of his life, he does meet God in the firestorm. So now God says, so this is the firestorm is for Elijah, but God is saying this is something else and I am not in the storm this time, I am not in the fire storm. Do you know where I am? I am in the kol demamah dakah. We'll get back to that in a moment.

I just want to point out one thing after this epiphany. What's Elijah's reaction? "Vayehi kishmoa Eliyahu" – As Elijah hears this vayalet panav beadarto, he hides his face in his coat because God has appeared to him and he is scared. What does this reminds you of? Who else hides his face when he sees the presence of God for the first time? The answer is Moses. Where does Moses hide his face? At the sneh,at the burning bush. There also there was fire by the way, God had appeared in fire. And Moses seeing that, "vayaster Moshe panav" – "he goes and he hides his face in his hand because he doesn't want to see God."

So what happens is interesting. If you look at the letter pattern here, we have in immediate succession in the Elijah story, reminds us of Moses twice. The first time it's Moses at the Golden Calf, the second time when Moses hides his face, it's Moses where? At the burning bush, at the sneh. Which story comes first in Moses life? The burning bush is Moses inauguration into prophecy. Which is the climax in Moses prophecy? It's Moses epiphany in the wake of the Golden Calf. But in Elijah, the stories are reversed. You have first the epiphany reminding you of Moses with the Golden Calf, and then after that, Moses at the sneh. You see the same letter pattern. You now see with three different stories. We have three different scene shifts. We have Elijah in the Akeidah, Elijah and Jonah, Elijah and Moses, one after another, it's all reversed. What does it means? Well I am out of time. This is the problem, what does it mean? I don't have too much time so let me pull this together, yes, go ahead really fast.

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:56:53]

Rabbi: That's true, that's a little bit different. That's also reversed. But I don't have time to get into that right now, it's a bit complicated, but you're right.

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:57:04] through the ages, [unintelligible, 0:57:06] that Hashem will always take us back and we will always get second chances and third chances…

Rabbi: Okay, good! I think you're right. Let's just develop that theory. There is another interesting thing too, just something I noticed last week, I'll share it with you. I don't know quite what to make of it but I am just going to share it with you and you guys can do with this what you will as long as you don't ascribe it to me.

There is one other interesting little echo over here. When Elijah goes and gets up, remember the angel touches him twice. Let's go back to that question, why did the angels do that? Elijah falls asleep once, and then he falls asleep a second time, and then the angel goes and say, "You have to get up and eat ki rav mimcha haderech. First of all, what's the deal with that? Ki rav mimcha haderech? You didn't even know Elijah was going on a long journey, you didn't know until the angel; says, "You've got a long journey ahead of you". It's almost like the angel decided, after Elijah fell asleep the second time, "it's time for you to go to Horeb. It doesn't sound like Elijah was going to Horeb; it sounds like Elijah was in the desert, he was in Beer Sheva, he went there because he wanted to died, he wasn't going to Horeb. Then he fell asleep, the angel woke him up, seemingly, if you've just eaten, everything would be fine, kum echol, but strangely he goes back to sleep. The angel's response to him going back to sleep the second time is, "you've got a long way to go. You better eat up because it's time for you to get to Horeb." It sounds like it's almost the angel's idea. What's happening over here?

So look at Elijah over here at that pivotal moment when he decided to go to Horeb, when he does go to Horeb. Vayakam, vayochal vayishteh vayelech. Where else do you have those four verbs in immediate successions; Vayakam, vayochal vayishteh vayelech, not exactly the same order, but those four verbs with nothing else in between? It's with Esau. Where?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:59:12].

Rabbi: That's right. It's the first story of Jacob and Esau. Where do you have it there? Vayochol, vayeshteh, vayakam, vayelech. What are the next three words?

Audience: [Unintelligible, 0:59:24]

Rabbi: Vayivez Esav et-habechorah. I mean it's weird, the only other time in Tanach we have these four words in succession, why am I being remind of Esau all of a sudden in that story? Is there something that Esau liked about that Elijah is doing now? This is the question. I leave you to ponder that now. Let's think about what Esau was doing, the Torah tells us about what Esau was doing. "Vayivez Esav et-habechorah" - "Esau was debasing the bechorah. He was taking the bechorah and saying it's meaningless. Why? Because, by the way, interestingly, Esau had a death wish also at that time, doesn't he? Remember what Esau says? "hineh anochi holech lamut" – "I am going to die", remind you a little bit of Elijah here too. Esau thinks he is going to die and therefore Esau is willing to sell the bechorah, he just doesn't need the bechorah and he is willing to die; and that is abizoi habechorah.

Now, what I am about to tell you is speculative, it's really just speculative, but it's kind of interesting. It's actually based a little bit on Rav Hutner, you can find this in Pachad Yitzchak but I forget where. So I can't give you an address off hand, I saw it years ago in Pachad Yitzchak, but here is a fascinating idea that emerges really from Rav Hutner. Rav Hutner wants to argue that there are two great forces in the world, so to speak. One force he call the force of bechor, to be a bechor. The other force he calls, is the opposite force, the opposite force from bechor. How do you spell bechor? Bet-chaf-resh. Do you see anything interesting about bet-chaf-resh? Two, twenty, two hundred; you see what's happening here? These are the two's right, these are the two's. So what would the opposite of bechor be? The opposite of bechor he is going to argue, is going to be rechev. Rechev – two hundred, twenty, two.

What Rav Hutner wants to argues that bechor and rechev represents two ways of operating in the word, potentially, two different ways that Jews can operate in the word, or any different way that two individuals inside klal Yisrael can operate. Let's talk about what a bechor is. What is a bechor? A bechor is a two, twenty, two hundred. Who does a bechor relate to? A bechor of who? A bechor of their father. How do you spell father? Aleph-bet. You see there? You see the pattern? One, two, two, twenty, two hundred. What sort of mathematical pattern are you looking to when you put the father and the bechor together? Father on top of bechor, one, two, and then just plot the graph for me. What does the graph looks like? One, two , twenty, you see that right? Twenty, two hundred. Exponential expansion, right? Powers of ten expansion.

Now, let's talk about rechev. The relationship to a rechev and a father would be, one, two, two hundred, twenty, two. Tell me what the graph looks like? The graph looks like this, and then all of a sudden, like this. A backwards parabola; a different graph. If you think about these two parabolas, the parabola of rechev looks like this. The parabola of bechor looks like this. Father is here, bechor looks like this, rechev looks like that. It's sort of curious that if you even think about the graph of a rechev, the graph of a rechev kind of reminds you of what a rechev actually looks like. What is a rechev? A rechev is a chariot? What is a chariot? A chariot is a thing that you sit on, a thing that maybe a father would sit on. If you imagine, it's almost like this bold shape thing, you have this ground over here, you have this rechev sitting on top of the ground. What's the purpose of a rechev? Let's talk about the father and let's talk about the ground or let's talk about what's underneath the rechev.

What's the purpose of a rechev? What does rechev do? It carries you. So if I have something that carries me, even say a car, what makes for a good car? What's the difference between a Lexus and a really nice rechev and say an old white Chevy Pinto jalopy? Stability, transmission, what does the ride feels like in a Lexus? Smooth. What does it feel like 72 Ford Pinto? Bumpy. So the purpose of a good rechev is to insulate the rider from the ground. A rechev isprimarily an insular vehicle, it's there to insulate you, it's also there to reflect. If you think what a parabola does, a parabola, mathematically, is the perfectly reflection vehicle, it reflects back. So which way is the reflection going? If father is here, up in heaven, what is the purpose of a rechev? It reflects back to God. And even if it reflects outwards, a rechev is also a sign of majesty, it reflects glory to the people whoever sees it, but also reflects it's energy back towards God.

Rav Hutner argues that's one way of seeing your mission in life; you can see yourself as a rechev. You can say, if I see myself as a rechev, what is my mission statement? How do I define my mission statement as a Jew? The way I define my mission statement is, "My mission statement is, I am here to reflect God's glory back to him, and also to reflect outward towards the world, God's glory." I am going to insulate myself from the world, I am in a rechev because the world is damaging. Everybody out there are potentially sinners, there is bad, I need to insulate myself, I can't be part of the world because I would then be pogem in my relationship with my creator. My job is to reflect God's glory back to him and back to the world. I am not really there to teach the world anything, my job is just to live in my dalet aleph, to be an example, make sure that I don't get ruined and through my life to reflect God's glory. That is one mission, but there is another thing. And by the way, what is Elijah known as? How did Elijah die? He goes up to God, b'rechvei esh, God responds to him, he is reflecting God's glory, he goes up in this chariot up to God. I am just about done. Give me three minutes and I will finish up.

There is another force, the other force is bechor. Bechor is exactly the opposite. The parabola goes the other way. If I am a bechor, I am part of the children, I am part of the family. The job of a bechor is to transmit, to be a conduit, to make the parabola go the other way, to transmit, to be involved in the world, to be involved with people, to involve even other non-Jews, somehow take that energy of God, teach, and to somehow transmit it to the others. I am not trying to reflect it back to God, I am trying to transmit it outwards. It's one, two, twenty, two hundred. It's going out there. It's more dangerous, but it's an entirely different way of seeing things. Vayivez Esav et-habechorah, the echo is in Elijah. It's almost as if Elijah is taking that mishnah bechor and throwing it away and saying, I am the rechev. I am not the bechor. I am the opposite of bechor. It strikes me as if the falling asleep twice was a kind of running way, similar to Jonah. What was he doing?

Think about what Moses was doing after the egal. What was Moses busy doing after the egal? What was Moses preoccupied with after the egal? Saving klal Yisrael. God wanted to destroy the Jews. Moses is willing to do anything to save klal Yisarel. What is Elijah preoccupied with doing? How does Elijah? He sees it entirely differently. "Kano kineti laHashem Elokei tzevaot" –"I acted zealously on your behalf." To act zealously is to be a rechev. I am reflecting God's glory, I am a rechev, that is my job. "Va'ivater ani levadi" – "I am the only one here", "azvu britecha benei Yisrael". It's literally the opposite of Moses.

In the Moses case, God was angry at klal Yisrael for having left behind the brit. In this case, Elijah was angry at klal Yisrael for having left behind the brit. But the roles are reversed. What God comes out and says here is mah lecha poh Eliyahu – "What are you doing here, Elijah?" He says it twice. Elijah answers the same thing twice. The second time Elijah answers, God says, it's time for a new navi. Lech, go and appoint Elisha as navi instead of you. What does that remind you of? Elisha is the bechor, he is not the rechev.

I want to close because you have your next speaker here and I want to turn you over to her, so I am going to close with this idea.

Finding God's Justice in the Prayer of Unetaneh Tokef

You have backwards stories. What is the common denominator of those stories? The common denominator of the Akeidah, the common denominator of Jonah, the common denominator of Moses, in all three of those stories, what's happening? In all three of those stories, they are all stories about an epiphany; a prophet has an encounter with God and the encounter is surprising and it's surprising in the same kind of way. In the Akeidah what is happening? In the Akeidah, God said, "Kill your child". If you didn't know the end of the Akeidah, and you are Abram imagining, "What is going to be the revelation of God at the Akeidah?" The revelation of God at the Akeidah is yasher koach, you killed your child. That would have been the revelation. But then, that's not the revelation. The surprising revelation is, "No! If you want to really understand who I am, here I am, I am not someone who wants your child, I am a rachaman. I have the right to take your child, that's true, but I don't want that. I am ultimately a merciful God, I am not going to do that." Jonah also. Jonah is flabbergasted. The people of Nineveh have sinned, they deserve to be punished. The epiphany there also is, God is saying "no, I am a rachaman, you have to understand, yes they sinned, but I am a rachaman. Same thing with Moses, if you're Moses, what do you expect the epiphany to be? Here is God saying over and over again," I want to destroy them, I want to destroy them". Moses is desperately trying to save them. By the way the epiphany, God says, "help me understand who you are" God responds, " You want to know who I really am? yud gimel tzerachamim. That's who I really am. That's my essential self. You know how mind blowing this is that God is here saying, "I am going to kill them, I am going to destroy them", you want to know who I really am? yud gimel tzerachamim is who I really am. That is the climax of nevuah for Abram, for Moses and for Jonah, their understanding that at his core, God is a rachaman. For Elijah it is the reverse. Elijah is the reverse of those stories and what ends up being the climactic moment for him is basically what he just says, kano kineti laHashem Elokei tzevaot – " I have acted zealously on your behalf", and it's essentially the story of Elijah's retirement where God says I need a different navi. And it's the backwards whereas for all these other nevi'im, their epiphany with the climax of their nevuah, it's as if for Elijah it's regressing and going backwards from a climactic moment because it's his resignation from nevuah in favor of Elisha that will take the unetaneh tokef in a different kind of way. I think as you look to Unetaneh Tokef, it will leave with you the thought of what does this say to you about the meaning of the still small voice in the Unetaneh Tokef. Have a good Yom Kippur.

Read More
Up Next (1 videos in Series)

1. The High Holidays’ Scariest Prayer